GHOSTLOGIC
 Talk to Forensics
Talk to Forensics
Why GhostLogic exists

Built in the middle of a real incident,
for the teams who hate guessing.

GhostLogic didn’t start as a product roadmap. It started as a “no one believes me” response to a persistent, very real intrusion. The kind that quietly erases its own tracks and makes the target look paranoid.

From “trust the logs” to “trust the evidence.”

The founder behind GhostLogic spent months fighting an intrusion that behaved like a long-term, adaptive rootkit. Every time something suspicious surfaced, it disappeared. Logs rotated. Artifacts vanished. Screenshots were the only proof anything weird had happened at all.

Buying a full-blown forensics engagement wasn’t an option. So the only realistic move was to build the tooling: an always-on evidence collector that didn’t care whether anyone believed the story yet.

GhostLogic is the result of that grind: a forensic mesh designed to keep capturing, keep hashing, and keep the record intact even when an attacker has root, time, and a bad attitude.

Design principles

Everything in GhostLogic is anchored to one simple requirement: you should be able to reconstruct what happened even when the attacker “wins.”

  • 1 Evidence first, alerts second.
    If it’s not timestamped, hashed, and stored, it’s gossip. GhostLogic captures before it tries to be clever.
  • 2 Assume the box is hostile.
    We assume compromised endpoints, compromised admins, and nosy LLMs prowling for keys and trade secrets.
  • 3 Reproducible timelines.
    If you can’t replay the incident with frame-level detail, you’re negotiating, not testifying.
  • 4 No black boxes you can’t audit.
    Core is open. Architecture is documented. The fancy stuff is optional, not required to trust the system.

Who we build for

GhostLogic is opinionated. It’s not a feel-good dashboard for “security visibility.” It’s built for people whose credibility is on the line when they say, “Here’s what happened.”

  • •DFIR teams who want replay, not just alerts.
  • •MSSPs and consultancies who need repeatable evidence across clients.
  • •In-house blue teams who know “the logs” are barely the beginning.
  • •Legal teams who are tired of “we think” and want “here’s the proof.”

Where this goes next

The roadmap is simple: deeper capture, more robust timelines, tighter integrations with what you already run, and just enough AI to keep up with attackers without turning your stack into a guessing contest.

The north star doesn’t change: if an attacker touches it, you should be able to prove it happened.

Want the unfiltered version?

If you care about the messy, technical details of how GhostLogic was battle-tested, we’re happy to go there. Bring your senior DFIR folks and questions.

Schedule a technical briefing